| 1996-2004: About the Revise F65 project. Revise F65 efforts for the leather/fetish/BDSM community |
![]() Revise F65 presentation for BVSM e.V. in Fulda Germany 2007. ![]() The ReviseF65 project group October 2002: From the top left: Kelly Andreassen SMil-Norway, Eric Barstad Smia, Svein Skeid Smia. From left below: Secretary Bent Hvale, psychiatrist Reidar Kjær, Øyvind Aamodt SLM-Oslo Petter Møller LLH, and psychologist Odd Reiersøl. Sexism, racism, homophobia and sadomasophobia: The German professor of psychiatry Richard von Krafft-Ebing, who in 1886 introduced the "perversions" in "Psychopathia Sexualis", was also an eager spokesman for the "degeneration theory". Not only were homosexuals, sadomasochists and fetishists degenerated. The scientific incorrect degeneration theory also included women in general, poor people and other races. May be today's alternative sexualities experience the "racism" or "sexism" of our time. Some researchers talk about the phenomena of "sadomasophobia" and may be "fetishphobia". Thanks to the women liberation movement, the gay movement and the civil rights movement, the ”scientific truth" of the attitudes leading to sexism, homophobia and racism has become history. Now it is up to the SM movement to get rid of the "science" that leads to sadomasophobia and fetishphobia.
|
|||
March 8, 1996. Smia was thrown out of the International Women’s Day parade in Oslo because of our slogan “SM is interplay, not violence”. The mistaken blending of SM and violence were introduced by the Austro-German psychiatrist Richard von Krafft-Ebing and is still kept alive by the ICD chapter F65.5 Sadomasochism. Decision by the March 8 committee in Oslo Februar 20, 1997 (letter and telephone from Turid Kjernsli in the March 8 committee) (The newspaper Klassekampen March 8, 1996). July 1998. The online newspaper skeivenyheter.no wrote about SM/fetish diagnoses and BDSM human rights in the years before revisef65.org was established. November 1998. SM A sexy diagnosis. "Removal of SM and fetish diagnoses is one of the most important tasks of the human rights group Smia." Smia is the prime mover behind the Revise F65 group. Report in the monthly gay and lesbian magazine Blikk.
January 1999 professional leader [fagsjef] Ellen Hagemo in the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision wrongly contended that “we cannot just change the national version of the ICD diagnoses”. (According to report from Revise F65 meeting January 20, 1999.)
The LLH Convention in 2000 once again approved the ReviseF65 project, which "shall continue until the goal is attained". November 18, 2001. Svein Skeid held a presentation about SM human rights, including the Revise F65 efforts, at the University of Agder, Norway. The Revise F65 web site, established in 2002 in Norwegian, English, German and Portuguese, along with the corresponding mailing list, has facilitated national and international networks. In 2002 the ReviseF65 group had mail correspondence and personal contact with activists and professionals or held lectures in Norway, Denmark, Germany, Great Britain, Switzerland, Austria, Spain, The Netherlands, Russia, Canada, Hong Kong, Brazil and USA. Updated 2012: Iceland, Sweden, Finland, South Africa, Chile, Taiwan, Cuba, Australia, Italy, France, Scotland, Czech Republic and Poland.
The story and effort of the ReviseF65 project was printed late 2002 in the Bulletin of the Norwegian Society for Clinical Sexology. The ReviseF65 committee asked for, and received support on April 29, 2003 and May 8, 2003 from the Norwegian Association of Gay and Lesbian Physicians (HLLF) and the Norwegian Society for Clinical Sexology (NFKS). NFKS state: “The Norwegian Association for Clinical Sexology in its support wishes to emphasize that the use of psychiatric diagnoses in relation to homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual fetishists, sadomasochists and transvestic fetishists is stigmatizing and therefore an encroachment upon this group as a whole” (letter of June 11, 2003). “We have been working with the Revise F65 diagnoses for some years now and we realise that it has a long way to go. But if I live till I am eighty, and we are taken off the sick list at that time, I will be fairly pleased. You can compare it with the fight for gay and lesbian human rights. It took a long time for them to be deleted from the sick list too.” Svein Skeid (52) interviewed by the SMil magazine no 4, 2002.
LLH leader Tore Holte Follestad personally delivered a letter from the ReviseF65 committee to Mr. Dagfinn Høybråten, Minister of Health (Christian Democratic Party) on November 28, 2003. This laid out the professional and human rights arguments which underlie the move to take away the SM and Fetish diagnoses. We never got any answer to this letter. Two days later, November 30, 2003, SMia and Revise F65 also sent the application “Diagnoses, discrimination and HIV” to the Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Affairs [avd. Forebyggende sosial- og helsetjenester] asking them to remove stigmatizing psychiatric diagnoses from the Norwegian version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). We never got any answer to this question either. March 10-14, 2003, two members of the ReviseF65 mailing list; the Brazilian sexologist and clinical psychologist Maria Cristina Martins and the psychologist, psychoanalyst, Ph.D. in Psychopathology and Psychoanalysis by Paris VII University, Paulo Roberto Ceccarelli, presented a survey about SM and Fetish diagnoses at the XV World Congress of Sexology in Cuba. Their article, "The so-called "deviant" sexualities: Perversion or right to difference?", can be read at the Revise web site. Dr. Charles Moser also gave a lecture about the paraphilia diagnoses at the same conference. Moser and Peggy J. Kleinplatz' article "DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias: An Argument for Removal", can also be found linked up from the ReviseF65 main page. The ReviseF65 index page was renovated in 2003, with separate professional and human rights sections. In the professional part you can read Dorothy Hayden's article "Is Sadomasochism a mental pathology?".
http://www.revisef65.org/UKreportIML.html http://www.pawscave.dircon.co.uk/IML/support.htm http://www.pawscave.dircon.co.uk/IML/being10.htm http://www.revisef65.org/smpride.html http://www.revisef65.org/manchester.html Lectures on Revise F65 were given at two international psychiatrist congresses and one sexology congress in 2004. In 2004 Revise F65 established a bank account and made it possible to use a “Make a donation”-button on the ReviseF65 webpage. In November 2004 Revise F65 published a case study indicating that stigmatizing psychiatric diagnoses legitimize harassment and violence towards the fetish/SM population. We also published evidence that SM/fetish people have no higher degree of psychopathology than the rest of the population. Revise F65 also tried to carry out our own research projects. But in spite of several attempts, we didn’t succeed. The efforts were aborted due to lack of support from the educational and political institutions approached. According to Wikipedia, “ReviseF65 is now [2004] by far the most active and visible group working with sexual politics and human rights for sadomasochists and fetishists in Norway.” |